Flooring Specification & Risk Control: Why It Must Begin at RIBA Stage 0 and Be Upheld to Handover

Flooring failures are rarely caused by defective products. They are usually the result of risk introduced early and left unmanaged. If a specification is treated as something that appears at Stage 4, it may be too late to fully manage all associated project risks. A risk-reducing flooring strategy can therefore begin at project inception and be upheld — deliberately — through each RIBA stage.

Stage 0–1: Define Risk Before Defining Materials

At briefing stage, the project team can identify operational risk, not aesthetic preference.

What are the traffic patterns?
Will there be heavy point loads?
Is the environment wet, clinical, or chemically aggressive?
What cleaning regime will actually be used?

These questions shape performance criteria: slip resistance by area, durability thresholds, moisture exposure limits, acoustic targets. If they are not captured here, later decisions will rely on assumption.

Early-stage clarity also protects against late “value engineering.” When performance intent is explicit from the outset, substitutions become less risky.

Stage 2: Test Categories Against Reality

Concept design is where material categories are explored. The risk at this stage is premature commitment based on appearance or cost.

A risk-aware approach means:

• Comparing flooring types against defined loads and cleaning regimes.
• Reviewing maintenance implications with facilities input.
• Considering lifecycle implications, including service life and replacement disruption.
• Identifying whether environmental documentation (such as verified lifecycle data) will be required.

The aim here should not be to choose a brand. It is to eliminate unsuitable systems before design momentum hardens.

Stage 3: Convert Intent into Measurable Requirements

We feel that Stage 3 is the most important risk checkpoint.

Performance must now be stated in measurable terms:

• Slip classification by specific area.
• Reaction-to-fire classification.
• Indentation resistance where heavy loads are expected.
• Acoustic performance where required.
• Subfloor moisture tolerances and testing protocol.

Interfaces — thresholds, skirtings, drains, movement joints — should be coordinated.

If these details remain vague at Stage 3, it is unlikely that they will improve later.

Stage 4: Formalise and Protect the Specification

Technical design is where any ambiguity becomes a potential liability.

The specification should clearly define:

• Substrate preparation requirements.
• Moisture testing standards.
• Adhesive compatibility.
• Conditioning and installation standards.
• Quality control procedures.
• Warranty expectations aligned with realistic service life.
• Sustainaility standards: A1-A3 detailing, etc

At this point, documentation must match intent. Any gap becomes a procurement vulnerability.

Stage 5–7: Enforce and Sustain Performance

During construction, the primary risk is deviation. Moisture testing skipped. Adhesives substituted. Installation rushed. Each shortcut compounds earlier discipline.

At handover, risk shifts to operation. Maintenance guidance must align with the selected system. Facilities teams should understand chemical compatibility and cleaning frequency assumptions embedded in the design.

A flooring specification is not a late-stage product list. It is a continuous risk management thread running from briefing to occupation. When that thread is established early and defended consistently, flooring performs as intended. When it is introduced late or diluted under pressure, failure is not surprising — it is predictable.

‍

Please speak to our team directly if you would like to discuss your scheme, specification or ideas. We write our blog for informational purposes only and value project discussions.

‍